Category Archives: Computer

Technology in the Classroom: Not always what you think

A.K.M. Adam (on his blog AKMA) pointed out the article from Inside Higher Education which reported a study about technology in the classroom.

Campus Technology, likewise, has an article discussing the report. Read their summary here.

The surprising (really??) result is that faculty think they do a great job and students don’t think their profs do such a great job. That is not the only disparate pair. IT departments and faculty don’t see eye to eye about how the other handles their role in technology in the classroom.

But as LeVar Burton might say, “you don’t have to take my word for it.” Go read the report yourself.

To download the actual report and draw your own conclusions, go here.

Vocabulary Resources: Part 2

My recent Boulders2Bits contest asked readers to submit suggestions for vocabulary resources. Here’s the second (of two) posts giving an annotated list of the suggestions (Part One can be found here). I’m apologizing up front for all the screen captures. I know it makes the post look cluttered, but I think it helps to visualize the programs.

Aleph Bet

Continue reading

Heard about the Accordance Training Seminar

Accordance
Dr. Chris Heard (of Higgaion) reports on the Accordance training seminar that he attended this week at the Master’s Seminary: Session 1, Session 2, Session 3 and Session 4.

His comments about Session 3 just explain that they covered language searches (which he already knew how to do, so he didn’t take notes). But Session 1 has a few good tidbits and Session 2 talks about fuzzy searches. Session 4 focused on reference tools, the atlas, timeline, and user tools.

I especially like some of the keyboard shortcuts (highlighted in Session 1) that I didn’t know about (or had forgotten) and the very cool ability to…

point to a word in a tagged text and then press the Shift key, the content of the Instant Details window will “freeze” and a new icon on the Instant Details window will light up. Clicking on that icon copies that data to the system clipboard. If you point to a word in a tagged text and then press the [Command] key, the Instant Details box will display the full entry from the topmost relevant tool.

Check out all the parts of his summary. But don’t forget there are many support videos online at Accordance too. I talk about them here, on my post “Accordance 101.”

And in case you missed it, Higgaion has a podcast now. Be sure to listen and subscribe.

Accordance User Tools available (from D&T)

Hebrew and Greek Reader has two new Accordance User tools available that they generated (and are generously sharing):

We’ve created an Accordance user tool compiling many of John Hobbins‘ posts on biblical Hebrew and translations of various passages of the Hebrew Bible. We hope you find it useful. As of now, its only up through 2007. We’ll apprise you of updates. We’ve also created a user tool of some articles by Dan Wallace on textual criticism.

They are waiting for permission to upload the files to the Accordance Exchange (which, you should check out!!). But in the meantime, you can download them from the links on their blog. They have also given me permission to put them on my server for you to access:
Hobbins (1.4 MB uncompressed)
Hobbins (664 KB zipped)
Wallace (594 KB uncompressed)
Wallace (283 KB zipped)
(just right click on these links to save them to your hard-drive)

After downloading, open them in Accordance to use the tools. Updates will be made available (the Wallace file still needs some work).

Redux: Fractals, the Scriptures, and Infinity

Several years ago, I wrote a bit about fractals. I am revisiting that post here.

I am so in favour of the actual infinite that instead of admitting that Nature abhors it, as is commonly said, I hold that Nature makes frequent use of it everywhere, in order to show more effectively the perfections of its Author. Georg Cantor, 1845-1918

Fractals are awesome (too bad that adjective is so blunted by overuse and misuse). Sure, they are beautiful and, of course, the fact that math is involved is intriguing to me. But the real reason that I like fractals so much is because I can think of no better way to describe how I think about the universe and eternity. And as I was taking some time to just “contemplate,” I came to the conclusion that a fractal also best describes my understanding of scripture.

Most people have seen the lovely images of fractals, and many may even have some concept of the mathematical equations that generate the images. But some of you may still wonder, “What is a fractal, really?” OK, Fractals 101.

  • Definition:

    a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole,” a property called self-similarity. Roots of mathematical interest on fractals can be traced back to the late 19th Century; however, the term “fractal” was coined by Benoît Mandelbrot in 1975 and was derived from the Latin fractus meaning “broken” or “fractured.” A mathematical fractal is based on an equation that undergoes iteration, a form of feedback based on recursion.”

    [Note: If you have been reading along with my Gödel, Escher, Bach book discussion group (see here), this will really start to set off fireworks in your brain. Any time you see the word “recursion” again, you will definitely think of Hofstadter’s explanations.]

    So what do fractals have to do with anything? For one thing, they are an easily accessible visual aid to the complex idea of infinity. One of the most amazing things to teach, I think, is astronomy. When you contemplate what you are really seeing when you look at the night sky it takes your breath away. With the naked eye you see the moon, constellations, planets. Zoom out… with binoculars or a telescope you can see more. And when you look at images from the Hubble telescope you are looking at stars and galaxies that are huge, old, distant, beautiful, and oh-so-numerous. A field of what looks like stars is really a field of entire galaxies. It kind of reminds me of the end of the movie Men in Black when the camera pans out from earth, to the solar system, to the galaxy, to a marble that contains the galaxy and is in the hands of some alien who is playing a game with it. I’m not interested in the alien aspect… I’ve just always been fascinated by the degrees of immensity.

    Galaxy in a Marble

    Now go the other way… zoom in to the earth, to the rocks, the minerals, the elements, the molecules, the atoms, the sub-atomic particles. But it is so hard to see the “big” picture of the universe and the “small” picture of the details all at the same time… except in a fractal! Looking at that one image I can keep going deeper and deeper and pondering the immensity of the created universe.

    [by the way, if you want to see the version of this video that explains the processes being animated, go here]

    But just as amazing as that (or maybe even more so), is being able to look at scripture in the same way. For so long I looked at Scripture far too linearly. I saw the history and the stories and prophesies. I memorized the Gospel accounts and looked for the symbols and types in the Old Testament and fulfillment in the New. But now I see that there is so much more. Just as a fractal is one whole that beautifully communicates a single equation, so Scripture is one communication–a breaking into creation by God–with both a singleness and multiplicity. One story, unfolded in many iterations. Acted out over centuries, through many generations, cultures, languages, and individuals. Story upon story. But all part of the same one communication. God is breaking through to us to tell us about Himself. Using our own human context to speak to us, so that we can understand. It’s more beautiful and more amazing than a hundred thousand galaxies or the patterns repeated over and over in nature or the dancing movement of electrons and quarks and leptons.

    Sometimes the beauty and majesty are hard to see in the black and white text, and so I keep a mental bookmark of a fractal image in my Bible to remind me of just how glorious and precious the book in my hands is.

Why bother buying GKC Module when it is free online?

Disclaimer: Except for the links to the free online GKC, the rest of this post assumes you own a Mac (don’t you?) and you are using Accordance.

Indeed, why bother? Isn’t it an old book in the public domain? Isn’t GKC available online?

Now, don’t get me wrong. I think it is wonderful to be able to access Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar for free online instead of having to buy a hard copy. You can read it in German here (online, or download as a PDF). You can access it in English here.

So, why pay Accordance for the GKC module (currently on sale until Oct 11th for $55)?

Quite simply, these features (as described on the Accordance website):

  • quick lookup via the familiar section-letter reference scheme (e.g. 75h), and additionally permits searches for scripture references, Hebrew and Greek content, and even transliteration,
  • useful typographical features: the type size distinction between primary and secondary discussion has been preserved, scripture references have been reformatted (e.g. Ec I17 becomes Ec 1:17), and the occasional Arabic or Syriac script citations have been transliterated,
  • scans of numerous passages whose accuracy depends on exact reproduction of the typeset page: for example, occurrences of Babylonian punctuation (the footnote to § 8g), the table of vowel classes (§ 9t), and the verbal paradigms (A–Q),
  • the useful Table of Alphabets script chart and facsimile of the Siloam Inscription, carefully scanned,
  • the Index of Subjects, with corrections, and
  • support for highlighting

To start with, the Accordance version is magnificently readable. It is not just a page scan (like the online versions).
GKC Accordance Screen capture

GKC Accordance Screen capture

You can easily copy and paste information for quotes.

But for me, the most useful aspect is being able to (accurately and completely) search for English Titles, Hebrew Titles, English Content, Scripture, Hebrew Content, Greek Content or Transliteration. The online English version does allow some limited English word search capability (Hebrew does not work), but nothing like what can be done within Accordance.

Also, by hovering over the Accordance GKC module hyperlinks, the linked material can be displayed in the Instant Details window. So, you don’t need to navigate to another section in the book or to another text in order to read a section reference or a scripture example.

Finally, as with all my Accordance modules, I have my library with me wherever I go (even when I am not online). I love books (I have too many of them), but digital reference tools like the GKC Module in Accordance are prime examples of technology put to very good use.