Category Archives: Bibliobloggers

Visual Tools for Learning Hebrew

Some people are visual learners (I’m one of them). Here are a few visual charts to help students remember some details of Biblical Hebrew. Click on the images to download the full size versions.

When I teach weak verb forms, I like to draw attention to the fact that the Qal imperfect, imperative, and infinitive construct often follow similar patterns. I refer to this diagnostic grouping as the Qal Trio (quicker to say than “the Qal imperfect, Qal imperative, and Qal infinitive construct). If you look at my Weak Verb chart (Front, Back), you will see reference to the Qal Trio and how it appears in some of the weak verb categories (look for my “traffic light” for the Qal trio). Rebeckah Groves brought this trio to life with this drawing, which helps students remember which aspects are part of the Qal Trio.

Qal Trio

Continue reading

Pete Enns on Science and an Incarnational Approach to the Bible

Pete Enns is the Friday “guest voice” in the science and religion dialogue over at Science and the Sacred (the BioLogos blog).
Science and the Sacred blog

He says this post is the first of several. Should be interesting! Check out what he has to say about Science and an Incarnational Approach to the Bible. In this first post, he sets out the problem as he sees it, then in subsequent posts he will define what he means by “incarnational model” and then will look at specific implications for reading the bible with this model in mind.

Using and Abusing Scripture

In light of some of the recent discussions on illegitimate word studies, this post by Scot McKnight seems appropriate to point out. McKnight highlights Manfred Brauch’s book, Abusing Scripture: The Consequences of Misreading the Bible, which Scot does not think is getting enough discussion. McKnight quotes 5 common ways that Christians abuse Scripture and then asks, “Which of these abuses do you see the most? Do you see others that concern you?”

The Priestly Vision of Genesis 1 (Mark S. Smith’s new book)

I just received my copy of Mark S. Smith’s new Fortress Press book The Priestly Vision of Genesis 1 which Jim West announced in August. For the record, I bought it myself. Perhaps with my newly earned position of #28 in the Biblioblogs Top 50 for October (up 127 places from last month), I will be able to convince some publishers to send me review copies of books to discuss on my blog (feel free to contact me for a mailing address!).

Priestly Vision of Genesis 1

I am looking forward to reading this book. I only want to note right now that this is truly a Mark Smith book: the text itself ends on page 159 and the appendices, endnotes, and indices take up pages 161-315. Since the book has a 2010 copyright, I feel like I am reading the future!

More anon.

Much ado… or much to do?

Gary Manning, on his blog Eutychus, has gone through the effort to produce a very good line by line refutation of the argument found in the Alef-Tav video that I pointed out at the end of my post ( Etymology Studies Live ) the other day.

I am going to bump a comment into this post to hopefully get some discussion going.

Bob Macdonald commented on my original post:

I wondered if you would get any comments on this painful video. The poor fellow is looking for certainty and absolutes where there is a different kind of knowledge available but its absolutism is unspeakable. Still it may be that by the foolishness of such preaching, even the wrongly impressed will find themselves moving towards a refreshed image.

To which I replied:

Bob, I struggle with these kinds of videos (and whether or not I should draw attention to them) because I vacillate between wanting to point out the misuse of language and recognizing that he is (probably) not trying to be deceptive/manipulative. On the one hand, his air of authority is distressing because I know an entire congregation is hanging on his every word as truth (and it’s not). On the other hand, his methodology seems to be simply an overly creative type of midrash (perhaps on steroids) and as you point out, may lead to a refreshed image. I don’t agree with what he is doing, but I don’t want to mock it either. It actually saddens me. There are a lot of people like this who are part of the Church, and as such, are brethren. How to lovingly relate, correct, challenge, and encourage are the tasks I wrestle with.

I think it is important to point out things that are erroneous or untrue. But I also think we sometimes cross a line and forget that some of these people who err (in our opinion) are often brothers and sisters in Christ. Would I say the same things that I do in a post (or in jest to a friend) to the person in the video? Do I take too much delight in pointing out someone’s shortfall? I also care about the people listening to this kind of teaching and wonder about the misunderstandings being fed to them. But the last thing I want to come across as is a “know-it-all” (which I don’t) who is tearing down without building up.

What is the best way to handle these types of issues? We all know churches and individuals who are different than us. When do we step up and try to correct, when do we sit back and let things go, and how do we do all of this in a godly manner?

Bibliobloggers not the only ones with gender issues

Last month there was quite a bit of discussion about the number of women who are biblioblogging (see the last Biblical Studies Carnival for a good roundup of the discussions).

Therefore, I found it very interesting to find this post today. Apparently, the UK Times’ new science magazine Eureka has been accused of being male-centric (based on the content and look of its inaugural issue) in this post by Jennifer Rohn: In which I have seen the future of science, and it is male.
Continue reading

Accordance User Tools available (from D&T)

Hebrew and Greek Reader has two new Accordance User tools available that they generated (and are generously sharing):

We’ve created an Accordance user tool compiling many of John Hobbins‘ posts on biblical Hebrew and translations of various passages of the Hebrew Bible. We hope you find it useful. As of now, its only up through 2007. We’ll apprise you of updates. We’ve also created a user tool of some articles by Dan Wallace on textual criticism.

They are waiting for permission to upload the files to the Accordance Exchange (which, you should check out!!). But in the meantime, you can download them from the links on their blog. They have also given me permission to put them on my server for you to access:
Hobbins (1.4 MB uncompressed)
Hobbins (664 KB zipped)
Wallace (594 KB uncompressed)
Wallace (283 KB zipped)
(just right click on these links to save them to your hard-drive)

After downloading, open them in Accordance to use the tools. Updates will be made available (the Wallace file still needs some work).

Take 5: Interview with Pete Enns

Pete Enns

Many blogs do a fine job introducing us to folks via interviews. I decided to take another tack on interviews. Rather than a long interview, I’m only going to ask 5 questions. Hopefully some of them may be a little unexpected and will yield some interesting answers.

My first guest for “Take 5” is Dr. Pete Enns. Pete is a good friend and I’m grateful that he took the time to answer these questions. Be sure to read his bio which is posted on his blog, A Time to Tear Down, A Time to Build Up. While there, you can also download many of his articles and essays, view his speaking itinerary (you really should hear him in person), and find lots of information about his book Inspiration & Incarnation.

Number 1
Can you give us a little of your educational background? What do you value from that time of study?

I was never much for school growing up, although I did alright. I went to Messiah College (1982) and graduated with a degree in Behavioral Science. It wasn’t until the following fall that I began to get interested in academics. I was discussing the existence of God with two high school friends–one a Christian and the other an agnostic philosophy major–and I saw how little I really understood about my own faith. That motivated me to begin reading and one thing led to another. Three years later I was an MDiv student at Westminster Theological Seminary (1985-89) and four more years later I was doing doctoral work at Harvard University (Near Eastern Languages and Civilization, 1989-94).

What I valued most came to a head at Harvard. There I found a true community of learning that valued intellectual adventure, true discovery, and the freedom to go where evidence leads. It was a truly academic environment, and I will always be thankful for the years I had there.

Number 2

Was your dissertation, Exodus Retold, a stepping stone or a trajectory setter? In what way(s)?

I was exposed, through Jim Kugel and Jon Levenson, to the world of Jewish biblical interpretation. Even though it was not addressed at any length, it became very clear to me–as it has for many other who have gone down that same path–that the NT’s use of the OT must be understood within this larger hermeneutical world. My dissertation is on the Wisdom of Solomon, a likely early 1st century AD text, that handles the biblical exodus tradition for a particular theological purpose. That author was also clearly dependent on interpretive traditions that had been built up about the exodus for a very long time. This same general situation is quite evident in the NT: NT authors re-appropriating the OT for particular theological purposes, and in numerous instances showing clear dependence on previous interpretive traditions. So, I think it was both a stepping stone and trajectory setter: I wanted to broaden my understanding of the NT hermeneutic but I did not fully anticipate where that trajectory would lead.

Number 3I know you are currently teaching a Hebrew reading course and that the biblical studies courses you have taught involved a lot of Hebrew. Can you speak to what you think is important to learn about Hebrew before reading the Hebrew Bible? How does reading the HB in the original languages affect your own study of scripture?

I am teaching “Accelerated Hebrew Reading” at Princeton Theological Seminary, and we are reading through selected portions (about 80 chapters) of the Pentateuch. At Westminster, most of my teaching had some explicit connection with the Hebrew OT, particularly my doctoral seminars. There are a lot of ways I could answer your question about what is important to learn about Hebrew before reading the Hebrew Bible. Besides the obvious–a lot of memorization of paradigms and basic vocabulary–I would mention three things. One is to do a lot of reading out loud even at the earliest stages. It facilitates a working knowledge of Hebrew by engaging hearing not just seeing. Second, I would be prepared at how Hebrew does not “behave itself,” i.e., how grammars necessarily abstract the language almost to the point where a fair amount of what you’ve been learning doesn’t correspond to the actual biblical text. Third, I think vocabulary recognition is huge. Simply put, the more words you know, the more comfort you’re going to feel when you look at a page from the Hebrew Bible.

As for my own reading of the Hebrew Bible, reading in Hebrew reminds me constantly how very foreign this text is. It is too often tamed in English translations and Christian theology. The Hebrew also raises basic questions of meaning that are wholly lost in translations. It actually unsettles me, in a good sense of the word, to remember how big and unpredictable God is.

Number 4

What kinds of projects currently interest you and why?

I am working on a Homeschooling curriculum for grades 1-12, and I am taking a biblical theological approach rather than a “Bible stories” approach. For the first 4 years the focus is on getting to know Jesus, then the overall drama of the Bible, followed by historical issues in the high school years. I feel that children are taught a view of the Bible that does not always stand up to scrutiny and it can lead to unnecessary crises later in life.

I am also working on a book that dialogues between Christianity and evolution from the point of view of biblical scholarship (there isn’t really much if anything out there like that). In my opinion, this is a vital conversation to have where scientific paradigms and Christian theology are aiming for some rapprochement, not separation.

Number 5

You are a die-hard Yankees fan. What lessons can be learned from sports teams (and their fans) that might also be helpful for people studying the Bible?

Uh, nothing. Those are two things I do keep separate. Or maybe the Yankees are the Israelites and the Red Sox the Canaanites. It’s a contemporary application of herem warfare.

——————
Thanks, Pete!